Crow CI
Get started
§ CompareChecked 6 October 2026

Crow and the rest. Fairly compared.

Six CI systems you can run on your own hardware, against the same ten questions. Every claim comes from the project's own documentation or pricing page, or from our own measurement, as noted at the bottom. Where another tool is the better fit, we say so.

§ 01At a glance
Compare with
StrengthTrade-offGap
Topic
Crow
Server and agents
GitLab CI
Self-managed, Free tier
Jenkins
Controller and agents
TeamCity
On-Premises
GitHub Actions
Self-hosted runners
Forgejo Actions
Forgejo Runner
Woodpecker
Server and agents
License
Apache-2.0
Open core: MIT core, paid EE
MIT
Proprietary
Proprietary control plane, MIT runner
GPL-3.0
Apache-2.0
Every feature free
Yes, no paid edition
Merge trains, external repos and secrets: Premium
Yes
Free up to 3 agents and 100 build configurations
Free today; a runner fee was announced, then postponed
Yes
Yes
Forges
GitHub, GitLab, Forgejo, Gitea, Bitbucket; several on one server
GitLab; others only with Premium
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea through plugins
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps; not Gitea or Forgejo
GitHub only
Forgejo only
GitHub, GitLab, Forgejo, Gitea, Bitbucket
Pipeline format
YAML or Jsonnet in the repo
YAML in the repo
Groovy Jenkinsfile
Kotlin DSL, UI or YAML
YAML in the repo
YAML, close to GitHub Actions
YAML in the repo
Windows and macOS
Windows containers; fresh Hyper-V or macOS VM per workflow
Windows and macOS runners
Windows and macOS agents
Windows and macOS agents
Windows and macOS runners
Linux runners only
On the host only, without isolation
Autoscaling
Built in for 6 clouds; static agents first
Built in: AWS, GCP, Azure
Through plugins, e.g. Kubernetes or EC2
Built in: Kubernetes, EC2, vSphere
Kubernetes only, with ARC
None built in
Autoscaler not feature-complete yet
External secret stores
Built in: Vault, OpenBao, Azure Key Vault, Infisical
Premium only
Vault through a plugin
Vault built in
Through OIDC and actions
OIDC tokens, no native store
Through an HTTP extension you run
Metrics
Built-in dashboard and chart builder; Prometheus
Basic analytics free, runner dashboard Ultimate; Prometheus
Load graphs only; Prometheus through a plugin
Built-in charts; Prometheus endpoint
Actions analytics cloud only; Prometheus on GHES
No dashboard; Prometheus for the server only
No dashboard; Prometheus for the server
High availability
Several servers with leader election, on Postgres or MySQL
Free reference architectures; Geo needs Premium
Active-passive failover only; active-active needs CloudBees
Secondary nodes with failover; needs shared storage
Passive replica with manual failover
Not officially supported
Replicas mentioned, no documented setup
Server footprint
Go, about 20 MB idle; SQLite, Postgres or MySQL
16 GB RAM baseline; Postgres and Redis
Java; 4 GB RAM recommended
Java; external database; 8 to 16 GB typical
GHES: 64 GB RAM with Actions, plus blob storage
Go; SQLite, Postgres or MySQL
Go, about 20 MB idle; SQLite, Postgres or MySQL

Researched on 6 October 2026 from official docs and pricing pages. Details change; see the sources below.

§ 02When something else fits better

Pick them when it makes sense.

  • Self-managed, Free tier

    GitLab CI

    You want one platform for code, issues, registry and CI, and you are happy to host your code on GitLab and pay for Premium when you need merge trains or external secrets.

  • Controller and agents

    Jenkins

    You need a plugin for something nobody else supports, or your builds already live in years of Jenkinsfiles that work.

  • On-Premises

    TeamCity

    Your team lives in JetBrains IDEs, builds on Perforce or Subversion, or wants a vendor contract behind its CI.

  • Self-hosted runners

    GitHub Actions

    Your code is on GitHub and you want the Marketplace of ready-made actions more than you want control over the control plane.

  • Forgejo Runner

    Forgejo Actions

    You run Forgejo, build only on Linux, and want CI built into the forge with GitHub-style workflow files.

  • Server and agents

    Woodpecker

    You want the project Crow was forked from, with its own community and roadmap, and can do without VM backends, built-in secret stores and several forges on one server.

§ 03Where Crow falls short

Not everything. Yet.

The gaps we know about today, so you can weigh them before you switch. When they close, they close in the free release.

  • Login goes through your forge

    Users sign in with their forge account. There is no separate LDAP or SAML, and roles are admin or not, with repository access synced from the forge.

  • Kubernetes runs Linux only

    The Kubernetes backend schedules Linux pods. Windows builds use Docker or Hyper-V agents instead. The Podman backend is experimental.

  • A smaller ecosystem

    Plugins are container images, and Woodpecker plugins work as they are. That is still far fewer than Jenkins plugins or GitHub Marketplace actions.

§ 04Sources

Checked against official documentation and pricing pages on 6 October 2026. Projects change; if something here is out of date, write to mail@devxy.io and we will fix it.

Server memory for Crow and Woodpecker is our own measurement, not a documentation claim: the latest releases (Crow 6.9.0 and Woodpecker 3.18.1) side by side, with the same GitHub forge settings and SQLite, after a few minutes idle.